In 2006. The former cultivar flowers in the autumn, while the latter flowers during the

In 2006. The former cultivar flowers in the autumn, while the latter flowers during the summer. Both cultivars (2n=6x=54) were bred by the Chrysanthemum Germplasm Resource Preserving Centre, Nanjing Agricultural University, China. For the different flowering time, the pollens were collected from the male parent `Aoyunhanxiao’ in summer, and then stored at -20 in preparation for manual hybridization with the female parent `Yuhualuoying’ in autumn. Capitula of the female parent were emasculated by removing PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20690820 the inner hermaphroditic disk florets, and the ray florets were docked to expose the stigma. The cluster on LG Y21 was populated by QTL for four of the five traits (the exception was DS), and included the two loci qDFF-Y21 and qDW-Y21 which were expressed in both years.Digenic purchase Leonurine epistatic QTLThe ten pairs of epistatic QTL identified are listed in Table 4. Four of the five traits were affected (the exception was DFF), and each pair was associated with a PVE of 3.5-13.9 . Three of the pairs, mapping to LGs A7-A10, Y8-Y29 and A1-Y19, affected DS. The former two delayed DS by 17.8 and 56.2 days, respectively, while the latter accelerated it by 38.5 days. The two epistatic DC QTL were located on LGs Y2-Y8 andY33-Y52, the former accelerating DC by 42.3 days and the latter by 60.9 days. The PVE associated with the three DIF epistatic pairs, harboring on LGs Y8-Y17, Y33-Y52 and A1-Y1, varied from 5.1 to 13.9 . Of the two epistatic DW QTL mapping to LGs Y8-Y17 and A1-Y1, the former pair accelerated DW by 30.2 days and the latter by 24.8 days (Figure 1, Table 3). It’s noteworthy that the epsistatic QTL located on LGs Y33Y52, A1-Y1 and Y7-Y18 affected different flowering time traits and a genomic region could interact with several other LGs, for example, the LG Y8 locus was involved in epistatic interactions with those on LGs Y2, Y17 and Y29 (Figure 1). Additionally, unlike the other epistases involved in the background markersPLOS ONE | www.plosone.orgFlowering Time QTL in ChrysanthemumFigure 2. The clustered QTL and their relationship to the inter-related flowering time traits. (a) Distribution of clustered additive QTL on the linkage maps. The bar on the left shows the scale in cM. (b) Correlations between flowering time traits and the clustered QTL underlying these traits. Significantly correlated traits (P < 0.01) are connected by thick lines. Days from transplanting to squaring (DS), coloring (DC), initial flowering (DIF), full flowering (DFF) and inflorescence wilting (DW).doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083023.gthe epistatic QTL on LGs Y33-Y52 for DC took place between background markers and additive QTL (qDC-Y52).DiscussionLittle of the recent genetic research in chrysanthemum has focused on elucidating the basis of flowering time, but with the advent of well populated genetic maps, many quantitative traits including flowering time have begun to become amenable to genetic analysis via QTL mapping [27,32,37,38]. Flowering time, as has been shown previously by De Jong [24] and confirmed in the present research, is a highly heritable trait. Along with their high broad sense heritabilities (all above 0.85), the various flowering time traits were significantly correlated with one another, simplifying the manipulation of flowering time by breeding, whether or not a marker-assisted strategy is employed. The genetic analysis presented here, in revealing the location of a number of additive QTL controlling flowering time in chrysanthemum, at the same.