Source Funding for this study was provided by NIMH Grant MH

Source Funding for this study was provided by NIMH Grant MH043292 to Dr. Green. Dr Harvey has received a postdoctoral fellowship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). The NIMH and CIHR had no further role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
NIH Public AccessAuthor ManuscriptAIDS Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 December 1.Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2010 December ; 14(Suppl 2): 222?38. doi:10.1007/s10461-010-9804-y.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptA dynamic Chloroquine (diphosphate) web social systems model for considering structural factors in HIV prevention and detectionCarl Latkin1, Margaret Weeks2, Laura Glasman3, Carol Galletly3, and Dolores Albarracin1Departmentof Health, Behavior and Society, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 2Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 3Center for HIV Prevention Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 4Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Champaign Urbana, IllinoisAbstractWe present a model for HIV-related HS-173 chemical information behaviors that emphasizes the dynamic and social nature of the structural factors that influence HIV prevention and detection. Key structural dimensions of the model include resources, science and technology, formal social control, informal social influences and control, social interconnectedness, and settings. These six dimensions can be conceptualized on macro, meso, and micro levels. Given the inherent complexity of structural factors and their interrelatedness, HIV prevention interventions may focus on different levels and dimensions. We employ a systems perspective to describe the interconnected and dynamic processes of change among social systems and their components. The topics of HIV testing and safer injection facilities are analyzed using this structural framework. Finally, we discuss methodological issues in the development and evaluation of structural interventions for HIV prevention and detection.Keywords HIV; AIDS; structural factors; diagnosis; prevention Structural interventions have had a profound impact on public health. Even a casual observer of history can see the connection between structural changes such as water purification or highway safety and reductions in morbidity and mortality. Structural interventions can have a tremendous effect on individual-level health behaviors as well. Legislative changes such as regulating tobacco sales and usage have led individuals to modify their health behaviors and dramatically reduced smoking rates.1 Although structural approaches to health promotion are clearly effective, they are often viewed as outside the purview of behavioral interventionists. Prevailing conceptions of “cause” as immediate and necessary antecedents of health outcomes consider factors that affect outcomes in more indirect and indefinite ways as less important or less relevant.2,3 Structural factors have also been neglected because researchers in the field of HIV prevention are often unprepared to develop and evaluate strategies to change laws, social organizations, or physical structures. Moreover, because of the scope and focus of structural interventions, randomized controlled trials, the gold standard to evaluate interventions’Address Correspondence to: Dolores A.Source Funding for this study was provided by NIMH Grant MH043292 to Dr. Green. Dr Harvey has received a postdoctoral fellowship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). The NIMH and CIHR had no further role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
NIH Public AccessAuthor ManuscriptAIDS Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 December 1.Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2010 December ; 14(Suppl 2): 222?38. doi:10.1007/s10461-010-9804-y.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptA dynamic social systems model for considering structural factors in HIV prevention and detectionCarl Latkin1, Margaret Weeks2, Laura Glasman3, Carol Galletly3, and Dolores Albarracin1Departmentof Health, Behavior and Society, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 2Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 3Center for HIV Prevention Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 4Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Champaign Urbana, IllinoisAbstractWe present a model for HIV-related behaviors that emphasizes the dynamic and social nature of the structural factors that influence HIV prevention and detection. Key structural dimensions of the model include resources, science and technology, formal social control, informal social influences and control, social interconnectedness, and settings. These six dimensions can be conceptualized on macro, meso, and micro levels. Given the inherent complexity of structural factors and their interrelatedness, HIV prevention interventions may focus on different levels and dimensions. We employ a systems perspective to describe the interconnected and dynamic processes of change among social systems and their components. The topics of HIV testing and safer injection facilities are analyzed using this structural framework. Finally, we discuss methodological issues in the development and evaluation of structural interventions for HIV prevention and detection.Keywords HIV; AIDS; structural factors; diagnosis; prevention Structural interventions have had a profound impact on public health. Even a casual observer of history can see the connection between structural changes such as water purification or highway safety and reductions in morbidity and mortality. Structural interventions can have a tremendous effect on individual-level health behaviors as well. Legislative changes such as regulating tobacco sales and usage have led individuals to modify their health behaviors and dramatically reduced smoking rates.1 Although structural approaches to health promotion are clearly effective, they are often viewed as outside the purview of behavioral interventionists. Prevailing conceptions of “cause” as immediate and necessary antecedents of health outcomes consider factors that affect outcomes in more indirect and indefinite ways as less important or less relevant.2,3 Structural factors have also been neglected because researchers in the field of HIV prevention are often unprepared to develop and evaluate strategies to change laws, social organizations, or physical structures. Moreover, because of the scope and focus of structural interventions, randomized controlled trials, the gold standard to evaluate interventions’Address Correspondence to: Dolores A.