Self-referential childlike model to acquire phones, syllables and words from acoustic speech. Paper presented at the 7th IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning; Monterey, CA. 2008. Brothers T, Swaab TY, Traxler MJ. Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: prediction takes precedence. Cognition. 2015; 136:135?49. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.017. [PubMed: 25497522] Brown, M.; Kuperberg, GR. A hierarchical generative framework of language processing: Linking language perception, interpretation, and production abnormalities in schizophrenia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2015. Brown-Schmidt S, Tanenhaus MK. Real-time investigation of referential domains in unscripted conversation: a targeted language game approach. Cognitive Science. 2008; 32(4):643?84. doi: 10.1080/03640210802066816. [PubMed: 19890480] Brown-Schmidt S, Yoon SO, Ryskin RA. People as contexts in conversation. Psychology of Learning and Motivation. 2015; 62:59?9. doi: 10.1016/bs.plm.2014.09.003. Bush RR, Mosteller F. A mathematical model for simple learning. Psychological Review. 1951; 58(5): 313?23. [PubMed: 14883244] Camblin CC, Ledoux K, Boudewyn M, Gordon PC, Swaab TY. Processing new and repeated names: Effects of coreference on repetition priming with speech and fast RSVP. Brain Research. 2007; 1146:172?84. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.033. [PubMed: 16904078] Cedergren HJ, MG-132 web Sankoff D. Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language. 1974; 50(2):333?55. doi: 10.2307/412441. Chambers C, Tanenhaus MK, Eberhard K, Filip H, Carlson GN. Circumscribing referential domains during real-time language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language. 2002; 47(1):30?9. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2832. Chambers CG, Tanenhaus MK, Magnuson JS. Actions and affordances in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2004; 30(3): 687?96. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.687. Chang F, Dell GS, Bock JK. Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review. 2006; 113(2):234?72. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.113.2.234. [PubMed: 16637761] Chater, N.; Crocker, MW.; Pickering, MJ. The rational analysis of inquiry: The case of parsing. In: Oaksford, M.; Chater, N., editors. Rational Models of Cognition. Oxford University Press; New York: 1998. p. 441-468.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptLang Cogn Neurosci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 January 01.Kuperberg and JaegerPageChater N, Manning CD. Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2006; 10(7):335?44. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.006. [PubMed: 16784883] Chomsky, N. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press; Cambridge, Mass: 1965. Chwilla DJ, Brown CM, Hagoort P. The N400 as a function of the level of processing. Psychophysiology. 1995; 32(3):274?85. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb02956.x. [PubMed: 7784536] Clark A. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2013; 36(3):181?04. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000477. [PubMed: 23663408] Clark, H. Arenas of language use. University of Chicago Press; Chicago: 1992. Clayards M, Tanenhaus MK, Aslin RN, Jacobs RA. Perception of speech reflects PF-04418948 web optimal use of probabilistic speech cues. Cognition. 2008; 108(3):804?09. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.004. [PubMed: 18582855] Cole RA, Perfetti CA. Listening for mispronunciations i.Self-referential childlike model to acquire phones, syllables and words from acoustic speech. Paper presented at the 7th IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning; Monterey, CA. 2008. Brothers T, Swaab TY, Traxler MJ. Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: prediction takes precedence. Cognition. 2015; 136:135?49. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.017. [PubMed: 25497522] Brown, M.; Kuperberg, GR. A hierarchical generative framework of language processing: Linking language perception, interpretation, and production abnormalities in schizophrenia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2015. Brown-Schmidt S, Tanenhaus MK. Real-time investigation of referential domains in unscripted conversation: a targeted language game approach. Cognitive Science. 2008; 32(4):643?84. doi: 10.1080/03640210802066816. [PubMed: 19890480] Brown-Schmidt S, Yoon SO, Ryskin RA. People as contexts in conversation. Psychology of Learning and Motivation. 2015; 62:59?9. doi: 10.1016/bs.plm.2014.09.003. Bush RR, Mosteller F. A mathematical model for simple learning. Psychological Review. 1951; 58(5): 313?23. [PubMed: 14883244] Camblin CC, Ledoux K, Boudewyn M, Gordon PC, Swaab TY. Processing new and repeated names: Effects of coreference on repetition priming with speech and fast RSVP. Brain Research. 2007; 1146:172?84. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.033. [PubMed: 16904078] Cedergren HJ, Sankoff D. Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language. 1974; 50(2):333?55. doi: 10.2307/412441. Chambers C, Tanenhaus MK, Eberhard K, Filip H, Carlson GN. Circumscribing referential domains during real-time language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language. 2002; 47(1):30?9. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2832. Chambers CG, Tanenhaus MK, Magnuson JS. Actions and affordances in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2004; 30(3): 687?96. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.687. Chang F, Dell GS, Bock JK. Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review. 2006; 113(2):234?72. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.113.2.234. [PubMed: 16637761] Chater, N.; Crocker, MW.; Pickering, MJ. The rational analysis of inquiry: The case of parsing. In: Oaksford, M.; Chater, N., editors. Rational Models of Cognition. Oxford University Press; New York: 1998. p. 441-468.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptLang Cogn Neurosci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 January 01.Kuperberg and JaegerPageChater N, Manning CD. Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2006; 10(7):335?44. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.006. [PubMed: 16784883] Chomsky, N. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press; Cambridge, Mass: 1965. Chwilla DJ, Brown CM, Hagoort P. The N400 as a function of the level of processing. Psychophysiology. 1995; 32(3):274?85. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb02956.x. [PubMed: 7784536] Clark A. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2013; 36(3):181?04. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000477. [PubMed: 23663408] Clark, H. Arenas of language use. University of Chicago Press; Chicago: 1992. Clayards M, Tanenhaus MK, Aslin RN, Jacobs RA. Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic speech cues. Cognition. 2008; 108(3):804?09. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.004. [PubMed: 18582855] Cole RA, Perfetti CA. Listening for mispronunciations i.
Sodium channel sodium-channel.com
Just another WordPress site
