Histological images of the spinal cord at three weeks after injury.

Histological images of the spinal cord at three weeks after injury. Immunohistological images of longitudinal sections of injured spinal cords (A; GFAP, B; vimentin). Over-expressed GFAP and vimentin formed a major component of the glial scar; its astrocyte-rich structure would form a barrier to nerve fiber regeneration. Scale bars represent 200 mm. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051744.gTreatment of SCI by PMW-Mediated siRNA DeliveryFigure 6. Decreased cavity area in the spinal cord at three weeks after injury. (A) Histological images of longitudinal and axial sections of injured spinal cords at three weeks after trauma. Scale bars represent 500 mm. (B) Results of quantitative analysis of the area of cavitary lesions in spinal cords on the basis of histological longitudinal images. Values are expressed as means 6 S.E.M (n = 9, each group). The spinal cords of the PMW group showed comparatively smaller glial scars and the cavitation area was significantly reduced compared with those of the SCI group (**P,0.01) and the siRNA group (*P,0.05). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051744.genergy might cause damage to tissue. For instance, Kondoh et al. stated in their report on gene Title Loaded From File delivery to the periventricular region in rats by electroporation that tissue damage caused by electrical shock was inevitable, and that electroporation is not suitable for gene delivery aimed toward neural regeneration [68]. Throughout the present experiments, no detrimental effects on rats were observed after PMW application, which is attributable to the low invasive nature of PMWs as described above.Figure 7. Anterograde tracer labeling of CST axons at three weeks after trauma. SCI rats in the PMW groups showed more retracting fibers in the region caudal to the trauma site than those in the SCI group and siRNA group (arrows). Asterisks depict cavity areas. Scale bars represent 100 mm. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051744.gFigure 8. BBB scores after siRNA delivery. Results of motor function evaluation of hind limbs on the basis of open-field testing using the BBB scale at different time points after SCI. Values are expressed as means 6 S.E.M (n = 12, each group). Asterisks mean significant differences compared with the values in the other two groups (*P,0.05). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051744.gTreatment of SCI by PMW-Mediated siRNA Title Loaded From File DeliveryFurthermore, PMWs can efficiently propagate through tissue with high directivity and limited energy attenuation owing to plane-wave characteristics [33]. Thus, neural cells located deep within the spinal tissue can interact with PMWs, enabling targeted delivery of siRNAs into deep spinal tissue. For gene transfer to deep tissue in vivo, ultrasound-based method can also be used. However, it has been reported that, with ultrasound microbubblemediated transfection of spinal cords, the transfected cells were mainly meningeal cells at the dorsal surface of the spinal cord; no gene expression was observed in neurons or glial cells [69,70]. This could be due to the limited distribution of microbubbles in the spinal cord. Moreover, although virus vectors have been widely used for gene delivery to the CNS, it is difficult to spatially control the region of gene expression because of their extreme transfection activities [71?5]. The transient maximum pressures of PMWs were measured to be about 51 MPa at the position of the spinal cord surface and 20 MPa under the spinal cord (Fig. 1B), indicating an explicit interaction of PMWs with deep glial cells. The.Histological images of the spinal cord at three weeks after injury. Immunohistological images of longitudinal sections of injured spinal cords (A; GFAP, B; vimentin). Over-expressed GFAP and vimentin formed a major component of the glial scar; its astrocyte-rich structure would form a barrier to nerve fiber regeneration. Scale bars represent 200 mm. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051744.gTreatment of SCI by PMW-Mediated siRNA DeliveryFigure 6. Decreased cavity area in the spinal cord at three weeks after injury. (A) Histological images of longitudinal and axial sections of injured spinal cords at three weeks after trauma. Scale bars represent 500 mm. (B) Results of quantitative analysis of the area of cavitary lesions in spinal cords on the basis of histological longitudinal images. Values are expressed as means 6 S.E.M (n = 9, each group). The spinal cords of the PMW group showed comparatively smaller glial scars and the cavitation area was significantly reduced compared with those of the SCI group (**P,0.01) and the siRNA group (*P,0.05). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051744.genergy might cause damage to tissue. For instance, Kondoh et al. stated in their report on gene delivery to the periventricular region in rats by electroporation that tissue damage caused by electrical shock was inevitable, and that electroporation is not suitable for gene delivery aimed toward neural regeneration [68]. Throughout the present experiments, no detrimental effects on rats were observed after PMW application, which is attributable to the low invasive nature of PMWs as described above.Figure 7. Anterograde tracer labeling of CST axons at three weeks after trauma. SCI rats in the PMW groups showed more retracting fibers in the region caudal to the trauma site than those in the SCI group and siRNA group (arrows). Asterisks depict cavity areas. Scale bars represent 100 mm. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051744.gFigure 8. BBB scores after siRNA delivery. Results of motor function evaluation of hind limbs on the basis of open-field testing using the BBB scale at different time points after SCI. Values are expressed as means 6 S.E.M (n = 12, each group). Asterisks mean significant differences compared with the values in the other two groups (*P,0.05). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051744.gTreatment of SCI by PMW-Mediated siRNA DeliveryFurthermore, PMWs can efficiently propagate through tissue with high directivity and limited energy attenuation owing to plane-wave characteristics [33]. Thus, neural cells located deep within the spinal tissue can interact with PMWs, enabling targeted delivery of siRNAs into deep spinal tissue. For gene transfer to deep tissue in vivo, ultrasound-based method can also be used. However, it has been reported that, with ultrasound microbubblemediated transfection of spinal cords, the transfected cells were mainly meningeal cells at the dorsal surface of the spinal cord; no gene expression was observed in neurons or glial cells [69,70]. This could be due to the limited distribution of microbubbles in the spinal cord. Moreover, although virus vectors have been widely used for gene delivery to the CNS, it is difficult to spatially control the region of gene expression because of their extreme transfection activities [71?5]. The transient maximum pressures of PMWs were measured to be about 51 MPa at the position of the spinal cord surface and 20 MPa under the spinal cord (Fig. 1B), indicating an explicit interaction of PMWs with deep glial cells. The.