Ll experiments. Physical measurements. Elemental analyses (C, H and N) were carried out with a Perkin lmer 240C elemental analyzer. 1 H NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Mercury-plus 300 NMR spectrometer with DMSO-d6 as a solvent and SiMe4 as an internal standard at 300 MHz at room temperature. An LCQFigure 1. Synthesis routes for ligand and ruthenium complexes L-[Ru(phen)2(p-HPIP)]2+ and D-[Ru(phen)2(p-HPIP)]2+. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050902.gChiral Ru Complexes Inhibit Telomerase Activityelectrospray mass spectrometer (ESMS, Finnigan) was employed for the investigation of charged metal complex species in CH3CN solvent. Emission spectra were measured on a recorded on PerkinElmer Lambda-850 spectrophotometer with excitation at 18334597 460 nm, and circular dichroism (CD) spectra were measured on a Jasco J810 spectropolarimeter.Synthesis and characteristics of ligands and complexes. RuII chloride Fruquintinib site hydrate (Alfa Aesar), 1,10-phenan-throline -5,6-dione and p-HPIP (2-(4-hydroxy-phenyl) imidazo[4,5-f] [1,10] phenanthroline) were obtained from Sigma. cis-[Ru(phen)2(py)2]Cl2, D-[Ru(cis-[Ru(phen)2Cl2]?2H2O, phen)2(py)2] [O,O9-dibenzoyl -D-tartrate]?12H2O and L-[Ru(phen)2(py)2] [O,O9-dibenzoyl -L-tartrate]?12H2O were prepared and characterized according to the literature [28]. (p-HPIP) was also prepared according to the literature [29].Synthesis of L-[Ru(phen)2(p-HPIP)](ClO4)2?2H2O (LRu). This complex was synthesized in a manner identical tothat described for D-[Ru(phen)2(p-HPIP)] (ClO4)2?2H2O With L[Ru(phen)2(py)2] [O,O9-dibenzoyl – tartrate]?12H2O and pHPIP, and exhibited an identical 1HNMR spectrum. Yield: 150 mg, 75.00 . 1H NMR(DMSO-d6, dppm): 8.00(1H, d); 8.05(1H, d); 7.67(1H, 2d); 7.72(1H, 2d); 8.67(1H, d); 8.70(1H, d); 8.29(2H, s); 7.88(1H, d); 7.70(1H, 2d);9.11(1H, d); 8.13(1H, d); 6.81(1H, d); 3.14(Me, s) (Figure S4). ES-MS of the ClO4 salt in MeCN: m/z 773.3(M-2ClO4-H); 387.3 ((M-2ClO4)/2). UV-Vis (l (nm), e (104 M21 cm21)) (CH3OH): 263 (0.53), 346 (0.36), 6463 (0.11)(Figure S5). CD (l (nm), De (M21 cm21)) (CH3OH)): 470 (5.03), 307(1.14), 269 (4.15) (Figure S6).Synthesis of D-[Ru(phen)2(p-HPIP)](ClO4)2?2H2O (DO9-dibenzoyl-D-tartrate]?12H2O Ru). D-[Ru(phen)2(py)2][O,(0.22g, 0.2 mmol), p-HPIP (0.12 g, 0.36 mmol) were added to 20 ml ethylene glycol ater(9:1, v/v). The mixture was refluxed for 6 h under an argon atmosphere. The cooled reaction mixture was diluted with water (40 ml) and filtered to remove solid impurities. Ammonium hexafluorophosphate was added to the MedChemExpress Thiazole Orange filtrate. The precipitated complex was dried, dissolved in a small amount of acetonitrile, 1407003 and purified by chromatography over alumina, using MeCN oluene (2:1, v/v) as eluent, yield: 140 mg, 70.01 . 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, d ppm): 9.02(2H, d); 8.78(4H, d); 8.39(4H, s); 8.13(2H, d); 8.12(2H, d); 8.10(2H, d); 8.08(2H, d); 7.78(6H, m); 6.95(2H, d). ES-MS of the ClO4 salt in MeCN: m/z 773.6(M-2ClO4-H); 387.3 ((M-2ClO4)/2). UV-Vis (l (nm), e (104 M21 cm21)) (CH3OH): 263 (0.80), 282 (0.54), 464 (0.16) (Figure S7). CD (l (nm), De (M21 cm21)) (CH3RU)): 470 (20.49), 307(21.19.), 269 (24.30) (Figure S6).Synthesis of [Ru(phen)2(p-HPIP)] (ClO4)2?2H2O (L/D-Ru)[Ru(phen)2Cl2] ?2H2O (0.12 g, 0.2 mmol) and p-HPIP(0.12 g, 0.36 mmol) were added to 20 ml ethylene glycol ater(9:1, v/v). The mixture was refluxed for 6 h under an argon atmosphere. The cooled reaction mixture was diluted with water (40 ml) and filtered to remove solid impurities. Ammonium hexafluorophosphate was added to the filtrate. The pre.Ll experiments. Physical measurements. Elemental analyses (C, H and N) were carried out with a Perkin lmer 240C elemental analyzer. 1 H NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Mercury-plus 300 NMR spectrometer with DMSO-d6 as a solvent and SiMe4 as an internal standard at 300 MHz at room temperature. An LCQFigure 1. Synthesis routes for ligand and ruthenium complexes L-[Ru(phen)2(p-HPIP)]2+ and D-[Ru(phen)2(p-HPIP)]2+. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050902.gChiral Ru Complexes Inhibit Telomerase Activityelectrospray mass spectrometer (ESMS, Finnigan) was employed for the investigation of charged metal complex species in CH3CN solvent. Emission spectra were measured on a recorded on PerkinElmer Lambda-850 spectrophotometer with excitation at 18334597 460 nm, and circular dichroism (CD) spectra were measured on a Jasco J810 spectropolarimeter.Synthesis and characteristics of ligands and complexes. RuII chloride hydrate (Alfa Aesar), 1,10-phenan-throline -5,6-dione and p-HPIP (2-(4-hydroxy-phenyl) imidazo[4,5-f] [1,10] phenanthroline) were obtained from Sigma. cis-[Ru(phen)2(py)2]Cl2, D-[Ru(cis-[Ru(phen)2Cl2]?2H2O, phen)2(py)2] [O,O9-dibenzoyl -D-tartrate]?12H2O and L-[Ru(phen)2(py)2] [O,O9-dibenzoyl -L-tartrate]?12H2O were prepared and characterized according to the literature [28]. (p-HPIP) was also prepared according to the literature [29].Synthesis of L-[Ru(phen)2(p-HPIP)](ClO4)2?2H2O (LRu). This complex was synthesized in a manner identical tothat described for D-[Ru(phen)2(p-HPIP)] (ClO4)2?2H2O With L[Ru(phen)2(py)2] [O,O9-dibenzoyl – tartrate]?12H2O and pHPIP, and exhibited an identical 1HNMR spectrum. Yield: 150 mg, 75.00 . 1H NMR(DMSO-d6, dppm): 8.00(1H, d); 8.05(1H, d); 7.67(1H, 2d); 7.72(1H, 2d); 8.67(1H, d); 8.70(1H, d); 8.29(2H, s); 7.88(1H, d); 7.70(1H, 2d);9.11(1H, d); 8.13(1H, d); 6.81(1H, d); 3.14(Me, s) (Figure S4). ES-MS of the ClO4 salt in MeCN: m/z 773.3(M-2ClO4-H); 387.3 ((M-2ClO4)/2). UV-Vis (l (nm), e (104 M21 cm21)) (CH3OH): 263 (0.53), 346 (0.36), 6463 (0.11)(Figure S5). CD (l (nm), De (M21 cm21)) (CH3OH)): 470 (5.03), 307(1.14), 269 (4.15) (Figure S6).Synthesis of D-[Ru(phen)2(p-HPIP)](ClO4)2?2H2O (DO9-dibenzoyl-D-tartrate]?12H2O Ru). D-[Ru(phen)2(py)2][O,(0.22g, 0.2 mmol), p-HPIP (0.12 g, 0.36 mmol) were added to 20 ml ethylene glycol ater(9:1, v/v). The mixture was refluxed for 6 h under an argon atmosphere. The cooled reaction mixture was diluted with water (40 ml) and filtered to remove solid impurities. Ammonium hexafluorophosphate was added to the filtrate. The precipitated complex was dried, dissolved in a small amount of acetonitrile, 1407003 and purified by chromatography over alumina, using MeCN oluene (2:1, v/v) as eluent, yield: 140 mg, 70.01 . 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, d ppm): 9.02(2H, d); 8.78(4H, d); 8.39(4H, s); 8.13(2H, d); 8.12(2H, d); 8.10(2H, d); 8.08(2H, d); 7.78(6H, m); 6.95(2H, d). ES-MS of the ClO4 salt in MeCN: m/z 773.6(M-2ClO4-H); 387.3 ((M-2ClO4)/2). UV-Vis (l (nm), e (104 M21 cm21)) (CH3OH): 263 (0.80), 282 (0.54), 464 (0.16) (Figure S7). CD (l (nm), De (M21 cm21)) (CH3RU)): 470 (20.49), 307(21.19.), 269 (24.30) (Figure S6).Synthesis of [Ru(phen)2(p-HPIP)] (ClO4)2?2H2O (L/D-Ru)[Ru(phen)2Cl2] ?2H2O (0.12 g, 0.2 mmol) and p-HPIP(0.12 g, 0.36 mmol) were added to 20 ml ethylene glycol ater(9:1, v/v). The mixture was refluxed for 6 h under an argon atmosphere. The cooled reaction mixture was diluted with water (40 ml) and filtered to remove solid impurities. Ammonium hexafluorophosphate was added to the filtrate. The pre.
Sodium channel sodium-channel.com
Just another WordPress site
