E; use from the QAP as an internal competency test for staff after trained and certified; and an capability to evaluate efficiency with peers operating precisely the same assay. Published studies have addressed the intra- and inter-assay precision of ICS in complete blood and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) (Nomura et al., 2000; Horton et al., 2007; Maecker et al., 2008; Nomura et al., 2008). A recent study by our group on standardization and precision of ICS between laboratories (Maecker et al., 2005) revealed that ICS may be performed by various laboratories using a widespread protocol with good inter-laboratory precision (18?four ). This precision improves as the frequency of responding cells increases. In an effort to standardize the assays across laboratories, in 2005, we made a QAP for ICS assays. This plan was created to assess the inter-laboratory variability when sharing a widespread standardized protocol and reagents. Right here, we present the information from seven consecutive rounds of testing. A total of 16 laboratories from seven different nations participated inside the study in which pre-tested PBMC, along with lyophilized antigens and antibodies, have been distributed. The laboratories were requested to decide the percentage of cytokine+, CD4+ and CD8+ cells in every single sample. The evaluation of your data generated within this plan has allowed us to identify components accountable for ICS variability among laboratories that have to be taken into consideration when performing Quality Assurance of flow cytometry assays and reporting information for vaccine clinical trials.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptJ Immunol Procedures. Author manuscript; readily available in PMC 2012 January five.Jaimes et al.Page2. Components AND METHODS2.1. Participating institutionsNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptIn the very first round of testing, ten laboratories worldwide participated. This quantity improved to 16 by Round 5. A list on the participants is supplied in Table 1. All participants have agreed around the content material of this publication. Of note, the majority of these laboratories had been involved in a earlier study aimed at standardizing the protocol utilized in this ICS QAP (Maecker et al., 2005). two.two. PBMC preparation and cryopreservation Concentrated leukocytes have been ready by machine leukopheresis with anticoagulant ACDA by BRT Laboratory (Baltimore, MD). PBMC had been isolated inside eight hours postcollection using a ficoll gradient. Briefly, an typical of 11ml of leukocytes have been diluted with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) to 35ml and underlaid with 12 ml of ficoll. Following centrifugation for 30 minutes at 450g (at space temperature), the cell layer was collected; the cells had been washed three times with PBS and re-suspended in RPMI-1640 media, supplemented with 10 heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20554190 (cRPMI-10). Cell concentration was determined applying the Guava ViaCount assay (Guava Technologies, Inc., Hayward, CA), and PBMC had been frozen at 15 ?106 cells/mL in freezing media (22 FCS, 7.five DMSO and 70.5 RPMI). Pre-screening with the PBMC LM22A-4 chemical information donors for CMV responses was initially performed at SeraCare Life Sciences (Gaithersburg, MD) working with an IFN- and IL-2 ELISpot assay. Later, the central laboratory (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) performed an ICS assay and chosen the donors for each and every round. Two vials of your cryopreserved PBMC for every single donor were shipped to participant laboratories using a liquid nitrogen dry shipper. A suggested thaw.
Sodium channel sodium-channel.com
Just another WordPress site