En) and EV day profiles from Monday to Sunday for CHPEn) and EV day profiles

En) and EV day profiles from Monday to Sunday for CHP
En) and EV day profiles from Monday to Sunday for CHP (orange) and PV (dark blue) power production, household (green) and EV profiles (blue) powerfrom Monday to Sunday for CHP (orange) and consumption, Bomedemstat site battery charging (yellow). (blue) power consumption, battery charging (yellow). (blue) power consumption, battery charging (yellow).The resulting power exchange with all the public grid is depicted in Figure 4. More than the The resulting energy exchange together with the public grid is depicted in Figure 4. Over the depicted in Figure four. Over the year, the unique characteristics on the CHP and PV power plants turn out to be apparent: the the unique qualities on the CHP and PV power plants turn out to be apparent: the year, the various characteristics from the CHP and PV energy plants develop into apparent: the cold season is dominated by excess electrical energy production on the CHP that is operated with cold season is dominated by excess electrical energy production of the CHP that is operated with production from the CHP that operated a heat-controlled strategy. The summer time season shows dynamic fluctuations between a heat-controlled approach. The summer time season shows dynamic fluctuations in between times heat-controlled method. The summer season shows dynamic fluctuations between occasions with higher CHP and PV overproduction and EV charging events that cannot be supwith high CHP and PV overproduction and EV charging events that can not be supplied instances with high CHP and PV overproduction and EV charging events that can not be supplied solely with self-produced energy and power in the battery storage. solelysolelyself-produced power and energy in the battery storage. plied with with self-produced power and power from the battery storage.Figure 4. Grid load simulation outcomes for scenario S4 using a self-consumption maximising technique more than the year. Tenidap Autophagy Feed-in Figure four. Grid load simulation final results for situation S4 with a self-consumption maximising technique more than the year. Feed-in for the gird is adverse on the y-axis, purchase optimistic. a self-consumption maximising tactic over the year. Feed-in to Figure four. Grid load simulation results for situation S4 with for the gird is unfavorable on the y-axis, buy good. the gird is damaging on the y-axis, purchase good.More than the course of the year, 210 MWh of electricity is created onsite with PV and Over the course on the year, 210 MWh of electricity is developed onsite with PV and 210 MWh of electricity is developed onsite with PV and CHP More than the course in the year,self-consumed, resulting inside a self-consumption ratio of from which 115 MWh are CHP from which 115 MWh are self-consumed, resulting within a self-consumption ratio of from which 115 MWh are self-consumed, resulting in a self-consumption ratio of CHP 55 . With an onsite electricity demand of 127 MWh, on the other hand, the self-sufficiency ratio 55 . With electrical energy demand of 127 MWh, nevertheless, the self-sufficiency 55 . With an onsite electrical energy demand of 127 MWh, nevertheless, the self-sufficiency ratio amounts to an onsite the target of zero-energy consumption is missed. The reason isratio 91 and that amounts to 91 as well as the target ofof zero-energy consumptionmissed. The explanation is thatthat to 91 plus the target zero-energy consumption is is missed. The cause is the amounts the mismatch among electricity demand and production, in specific the peak demand the mismatch amongst electricity demand and production, in certain the peak demand mismatch in between electrical energy demand and production, in.